3 ms·
> that is, the Copyright Office can allow people to circumvent, but not allow people to publish software that helps other people circumvent Publish source code
by theandrewbailey 5y ago
> that is, the Copyright Office can allow people to circumvent, but not allow people to publish software that helps other people circumvent
Publish source code in book form.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bernstein_v._United_States https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bernstein_v._United_States
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Junger_v._Daley https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Junger_v._Daley
- dannyobrien 5y agoI know that you meant this more generally, rather than a direct response to Seth Schoen, but I'll just note that Seth is semi-famous for doing just that, with the DeCSS Haiku: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/DeCSS_haiku https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/DeCSS_haiku While the Bernstein case is a great victory, there's also the 2600 case in the Second Circuit: https://supreme.findlaw.com/legal-commentary/why-2600-magazine-is-not-going-all-the-way-to-the-supreme-court-with-its-digital-music-copyright-act-challenge.html https://supreme.findlaw.com/legal-commentary/why-2600-magazi...