5 ms·
I agree that this work ethic is indeed healthier and with most of the list, but I want to make one caveat: a programmer working secretly after hours to deliver
by ratww 5y ago
I agree that this work ethic is indeed healthier and with most of the list, but I want to make one caveat: a programmer working secretly after hours to deliver more is not really a 10x programmer, he's just someone doing unpaid overtime (and risking burnout). Truly 10x developers also only work 9-to-5, the same as 1x.
I also disagree that continuously improving is unnecessary. It absolutely should IMO. But it should happen between 9-to-5, in the workplace.
- manmal 5y agoIs that really a thing, secretly working more to give the appearance of higher output, while not even getting paid for it? Given the little time we have on this planet, this sounds like a suboptimal use of it.
- ratww 5y agoIt definitely is. It happens with over-achievers but it also happens very frequently with under-achievers. In jobs where people have quotas it is very visible, seeing people scrambling to finish it all by the end of the month, to the detriment of their free time. But this is also the "secret" of some over-achievers. It's absolutely unhealthy.
- deleted 5y ago[deleted]
- manmal 5y agoI think I'd rather invest the extra time into OSS or a hobby project, which, even if you only do it for vanity, might even look more impressive to others.
- mywittyname 5y agoCrunch times are a thing in a lot of jobs.
- bcrosby95 5y agoThe secretly part is usually what doesn't happen. Most brag about it. You don't get paid extra regardless because most of us are salary and don't get overtime even if you work 80 hours per week.
- deleted 5y ago[deleted]