3 ms·

> There were many prehistoric societies, but because civilization tended to have some form of written records, the prehistoric societies are not considered civi

• pas 5y ago
  That's archeology or something, not real history :)
  • usrusr 5y ago
    It's the threshold between "how much do we trust the author?" and the blanket claim of "used for ceremonial purpose" whenever something isn't entirely obvious. Yes, it's a real distinction. Archeologists and historians don't consider themselves one group at all.
• jl6 5y ago
  I personally find cave paintings to be compelling evidence for a behaviourally modern mind. They demonstrate great skill. The artists did not live in cities or have agriculture or writing, but I have little doubt that they perceived the world as we do, and were capable of essentially the same speech and thought patterns as we are. It’s an awe-inspiring tragedy and mystery that those lives were lived in a manner so unknown to us, and yet potentially so relatable to us. They absolutely would have had conversations around campfires. Talking about what, I wonder?