4 ms·
They were elected to the board by shareholders. That's entirely different than a hostile takeover. You can't say "this is not in the interest of the shareholder
by goodoldneon 5y ago
They were elected to the board by shareholders. That's entirely different than a hostile takeover. You can't say "this is not in the interest of the shareholders" when the shareholders voted for it
- ffggvv 5y agothen lets dilute the shareholders who voted for it as theyh are clearly idealogically driven and actively hostile to the company itself or its profitability
- goodoldneon 5y agoYea... you're stretching this one
- ffggvv 5y agoi dont see why. isnt that why they are saying elon is bad? because hes driving for free speech? why is it okay if its one person, or a few people, but >n bad actors is fine?