4 ms·
https://www.cnn.com/2021/06/02/investing/exxon-shareholders-climate-activist/index.html https://www.cnn.com/2021/06/02/investing/exxon-shareholders-... in this
by ffggvv 4y ago
https://www.cnn.com/2021/06/02/investing/exxon-shareholders-climate-activist/index.html https://www.cnn.com/2021/06/02/investing/exxon-shareholders-...
in this case yes. wonder why they dont
- orhmeh09 4y agoWhy do you think they dont?
- goodoldneon 4y agoThey were elected to the board by shareholders. That's entirely different than a hostile takeover. You can't say "this is not in the interest of the shareholders" when the shareholders voted for it
- ffggvv 4y agothen lets dilute the shareholders who voted for it as theyh are clearly idealogically driven and actively hostile to the company itself or its profitability
- goodoldneon 4y agoYea... you're stretching this one
- ffggvv 4y agoi dont see why. isnt that why they are saying elon is bad? because hes driving for free speech? why is it okay if its one person, or a few people, but >n bad actors is fine?