I imagine the point would be that pg writes many controversial things - with some of which the author explicitly disagrees - but this is one thing on which they

I imagine the point would be that pg writes many controversial things - with some of which the author explicitly disagrees - but this is one thing on which they do not disagree. Let's suppose, for the sake of argument, that Newton once wrote, "The sky would be most accurately described as applesauce." (The absurdity is there to suggest that you would not agree. Take something more mild but still controversial and I don't see how it's different.) > I don't agree with everything that Newton said but F=ma.