>Man drives car doesn’t necessitate that car drives man. Fortunately that's not what I implied, and you fail to recognize the error in your own reasoning. I'l

>Man drives car doesn’t necessitate that car drives man. Fortunately that's not what I implied, and you fail to recognize the error in your own reasoning. I'll say this one final time, and I expect you'll intentionally misunderstand again. Your point depends on the premise that free speech leads to the improvement of knowledge, which means that if a specific situation arose--even an isolated incident--where your premise of enhanced knowledge were untrue, then it follows that your conclusion that free speech is good would no longer be necessarily true. That is why your statement is false. The rest of what you've written is pseudo-intellectual fluff. >But new knowledge is always created This is not a given. You completely made it up. I wish you a pleasant day.