4 ms·
McCarthyism? (it is not 30s like in the article but it is 40s-50s)
by d0mine 5y ago
McCarthyism? (it is not 30s like in the article but it is 40s-50s)
- moron4hire 5y agoWeird definition of "recently".
- mdp2021 5y ago"Recently" ends upon uprootal.
- pc86 5y ago70-80 years is not any reasonable definition of "recently," particularly when discussing politics.
- moron4hire 5y agoI honestly have no idea what you are trying to say
- mdp2021 5y agoNo prob, I'll be clearer. Phenomena may be indicated which, in form of episodes, very defined events, may be part of a "past", but the direction, inclination, patterns behind those events may still be lurking much later. (For instance, an expression of fascism ended in the forties, yet fascism may linger, emerge etc.) So, thin latency and occasionalities aside - minor traits and occurrences that just confirm exceptionality -, for the phenomenon to be over it must be uprooted. Unexpressed but latent is "not over": it remains of concern, it may express differently, it may re-explode.