3 ms·
However, as has been a point of discussion here for the last several years, the SaaS services themselves are often as much "leeches" as the users when it comes
by Macha 5y ago
However, as has been a point of discussion here for the last several years, the SaaS services themselves are often as much "leeches" as the users when it comes to open source.
- pjmlp 5y agoMight happen, however my point was about the SaaS that are from the authors themselves.
- Macha 5y agoAh, in the case of developer originated SaaS, then sure, doing a SaaS offering rather than donationware might lead to more income for the developer, but I don't think that free software is alone in this - plenty of proprietary software that would once have had fixed boxed releases is now subscription or SaaS based too. Recurring income is a stronger business model, nobody's denying that, but that doesn't mean it's an improvement for the user or that those producing software with a goal of financial gain would have just released standalone open source software if only free software licenses had been more sympathetic to their needs. Rather, I think if SaaS did not exist, if their first goal is revenue, many of these groups would have just released straight up proprietary software.
- pjmlp 5y agoWhen users try to make a living as developers, income becomes something to worry about.