3 ms·
Hmm. I work in the field of second language education. I even read Hamilton’s pamphlet [1] ten years ago when writing a couple of papers on historical controver
by tkgally 5y ago
Hmm. I work in the field of second language education. I even read Hamilton’s pamphlet [1] ten years ago when writing a couple of papers on historical controversies about language education [2, 3].
I’m sure the Hamiltonian system works for some learners, especially those who are highly motivated to learn to read the target language. In most language classrooms, though, the method would fail quickly, because most learners of modern languages are more interested in learning to speak. They would also find the Hamiltonion method tedious and intellectually taxing.
However, I do agree with the author that the importance and difficulty of vocabulary acquisition are often overlooked in language education programs. I’m not sure, though, how many people would acquire vocabulary better through the Hamiltonian system than through other methods. There’s a lot of individual variation in learning styles.
When learning Japanese, which I now read, write, and speak fluently, I did a lot of brute-force vocabulary memorization using flashcards while also reading extensively without a dictionary and, at first, without much comprehension. Although I later worked as a Japanese-English translator, when initially learning the language I didn’t use translation at all, and all of the language classes I took were taught only in Japanese. But I don’t know many other people who learned languages successfully in the same way I did, and I myself wouldn’t be able to learn another language that way again.
In any case, if anyone wants to try the Hamiltonian method themselves, textbooks are available at the Internet Archive [4, 5]. Let me know if it works for you.
[1] https://archive.org/details/historyprinciple00hamirich/page/n5/mode/2up https://archive.org/details/historyprinciple00hamirich/page/...
[2] http://gally.net/writings/2012_Disputes_about_Language_Teaching.pdf http://gally.net/writings/2012_Disputes_about_Language_Teach...
[3] http://gally.net/writings/2012_Which_Languages_to_Teach.pdf http://gally.net/writings/2012_Which_Languages_to_Teach.pdf
[4] https://archive.org/details/opera00sall/page/n3/mode/2up https://archive.org/details/opera00sall/page/n3/mode/2up
[5] https://archive.org/details/corneliusneposad00nepo/page/n9/mode/2up https://archive.org/details/corneliusneposad00nepo/page/n9/m...
- tomcam 5y agoFascinating journey. > I myself wouldn’t be able to learn another language that way again. Because…?
- tkgally 5y agoPartly my age: I began learning Japanese when I was twenty-six, and I am now sixty-five. Language acquisition does get more difficult as we age. But probably more important is that, when I started studying Japanese, I was in a sweet spot of motivation, time, and background. I had just moved to Japan and was working in Tokyo, first as an English editor and later as an English teacher. I knew no Japanese at first, and daily life was challenging; I was also very curious about the country and culture I had immersed myself in. Every bit of the language I acquired was useful and interesting, and that motivated me to continue studying hard. I also had no family obligations then, so I had plenty of time to study. Plus I had majored in linguistics in college and had studied other languages previously, so I knew from experience what study methods would work for me. I now have plenty of time to study another language if I wanted to, and I will have even more time after I retire next year. I should also be more knowledgeable and aware of my language-learning process than I was forty years ago. But I no longer have the practical motivation or the powers of concentration needed to spend three or four hours a day studying a language.
- tomcam 5y agoThanks for the detail you provided. It’s sort of a hobby of mine to learn how people learn languages fluently. I’m your age and I bet either one of us could learn a language as difficult as Japanese if we chose to at this late date.