I think the whistleblower and a lot of people here are noticing that there are inherent conflicts of interest that are easily misdirected and subverted by the d

I think the whistleblower and a lot of people here are noticing that there are inherent conflicts of interest that are easily misdirected and subverted by the due process involved in making these institutional conflicts. So yes, the whistleblower messed up as of course the proper chain of command looked into it and found no legal issue, because the legalese version of ethics was met. This is different from whether the law needs to be revisited. This is also different from whether the people with the financial conflict have a noble goal. Many people with political influence believe in their goals. Some benefit more people, others dont.