you're using relative terms to justify an absolute judgement. those jobs can be literally better than 100% of all other jobs available in a particular market se

you're using relative terms to justify an absolute judgement. those jobs can be literally better than 100% of all other jobs available in a particular market segment and it STILL doesn't qualify them as "good" jobs because "good" is a moral qualifier. should people be forced to work jobs as shitty and destructive as Amazon's because the alternatives are either worse jobs or starving on the streets? you're answering that question with yes and using rhetorical sleight of hand to hide the fact.