> When you state an opinion, you don't need to provide a link. It's an opinion. Yours is different. There we go. If we try to be charitable and assume your int

> When you state an opinion, you don't need to provide a link. It's an opinion. Yours is different. There we go. If we try to be charitable and assume your interlocutor knows this perfectly well, what could he/she possibly mean? Easy, they're asking what gave you that opinion. Answer that instead of being so adversarial. > But everyone else who's not a pro wouldn't have to see that feature and feel they OUGHT to understand it. You're generalizing from your own feelings. Can you imagine that lots of people actually don't get this feeling?