2 ms·
That's an interesting idea, and is effectively a trial run of fully removing a feature. Though, does that imply that you're working in a codebase without autom
by MereInterest 5y ago
That's an interesting idea, and is effectively a trial run of fully removing a feature. Though, does that imply that you're working in a codebase without automated testing? With automated testing, the "accidental" breakage would be more likely to be caught.
- 8note 5y agoIt tends to be that for features people mostly don't care about, the automated tests started failing years ago, and nobody will prioritize fixing them. At some point there was automated tests, but their failures are now ignored or have been turned off.