3 ms·
That sounds interesting! Google doesn't find any mention of that, only https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dynamic_Analysis_and_Replanning_Tool https://en.wikipedia.o
by rwallace 4y ago
That sounds interesting! Google doesn't find any mention of that, only https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dynamic_Analysis_and_Replanning_Tool https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dynamic_Analysis_and_Replannin... that says DART, far from failing hard, was a huge success. Do you have a link to the thread?
- agumonkey 4y agohere https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=31044510 https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=31044510 btw, I, too, couldn't find traces of the lisp side of this project after a 15 minute search. I was curious about the fix times and lisp codebase size
- rwallace 4y agoThanks! Right, so the successful version was the one written in Lisp. Okay, that's actually understandable. At that time, managed languages were not widely used, and C is really not a good choice for that kind of project. If those are the two options, I can certainly see how Lisp would do better.