3 ms·

Why are ignoring this whole thread, full of testomies to the fact that you can't, actually, edit any of it? May be this view isn't true, but in context of this

Why are ignoring this whole thread, full of testomies to the fact that you can't, actually, edit any of it? May be this view isn't true, but in context of this conversation intellectual honestly requires at least to acknowledge, if not meaningfully challenge it.

zasdffaa 5y ago
Perhaps link to a few such testimonies? I can see eg. <https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=31057311 https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=31057311> where people are explaining why an edit might not have been accepted for good reason. Make a case instead of complaining you're so hard done by. Edits can be done by asking rather than doing, a small edit was made after I asked for some clarity in the lattices article. WFM as they say. Edit: link to my question on lattices which got a small clarification done in the main article, with little fuss <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Lattice_(order)#⊤_and_⊥,_0_and_1 https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Lattice_(order)#⊤_and_⊥,_...>
nanidin 5y ago
Counterpoint: I fact checked and corrected an article - the original article author misread the cited source and claimed statistics that were plausible but incorrect. In the process I improved the readability of the paragraph I touched up. My change was never reverted, and it was within the last year on a page related to slavery and human trafficking. I suspect people complaining about reverted edits follow the same pattern as people leaving negative reviews online: people tend to be vocal when unhappy, and people that haven’t had problems aren’t motivated to do the opposite.
- Jaruzel 5y ago
  I have made many minor edits across many articles over the years, and never had a single one reverted directly. Some have been swallowed up during later re-writes and that's fine too. The thing is with Wikipedia, is a) register for an account, and b) start with very small edits. That said, I've never tried to create an article - maybe that's where the real battleground is?

zasdffaa 5y ago

Perhaps link to a few such testimonies? I can see eg. <https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=31057311 https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=31057311> where people are explaining why an edit might not have been accepted for good reason. Make a case instead of complaining you're so hard done by. Edits can be done by asking rather than doing, a small edit was made after I asked for some clarity in the lattices article. WFM as they say. Edit: link to my question on lattices which got a small clarification done in the main article, with little fuss <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Lattice_(order)#⊤_and_⊥,_0_and_1 https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Lattice_(order)#⊤_and_⊥,_...>

nanidin 5y ago

Counterpoint: I fact checked and corrected an article - the original article author misread the cited source and claimed statistics that were plausible but incorrect. In the process I improved the readability of the paragraph I touched up. My change was never reverted, and it was within the last year on a page related to slavery and human trafficking. I suspect people complaining about reverted edits follow the same pattern as people leaving negative reviews online: people tend to be vocal when unhappy, and people that haven’t had problems aren’t motivated to do the opposite.

Jaruzel 5y ago
I have made many minor edits across many articles over the years, and never had a single one reverted directly. Some have been swallowed up during later re-writes and that's fine too. The thing is with Wikipedia, is a) register for an account, and b) start with very small edits. That said, I've never tried to create an article - maybe that's where the real battleground is?