4 ms·
I do agree that books are the primary source of information for most subjects pre-2000, but at some point the books become so obscure that outside of a special
by dhx 5y ago
I do agree that books are the primary source of information for most subjects pre-2000, but at some point the books become so obscure that outside of a special reading room request made to the central library of a large country, no one would be able to verify the one or two book references on a Wikipedia article that would adequately describe the subject.
- ghaff 5y agoWell, that is one of the--for lack of a better term--fictions that Wikipedia (at least in theory) leans on. Which is to say an admin may or may not decide to follow the fiction. But, in theory, so long as something is cited whether or not as a practical matter a person would realistically look up the cite that should be sufficient. Of course, even verifying the cite could also be hard in practice.