4 ms·
> I would expect things to stabilize at a technology level of maybe the late 19th/early 20th century and start back up This is the part you should be concerned
by pharke 4y ago
> I would expect things to stabilize at a technology level of maybe the late 19th/early 20th century and start back up
This is the part you should be concerned about even if a nuclear winter doesn't or can't occur. Ask yourself how many people were alive at the end of the 19th century / early 20th and then compare that to today. Remember that it wasn't for lack of trying and that this was pre-birthcontrol. Then imagine what would happen if you saddled that technology level with 2x, 3x, or 4x the number of mouths to feed.
After a nuclear war the biggest killer would likely be famine. We never think about it since we have escaped it's clutches for so long but it is one of the biggest killers in human history. A nuclear war would destroy our current global supply chain and likely much of the national supply chain as well. Billions of people around the world would starve.
- taylodl 4y agoYou get it. Digital computers appeared in the 1950's and have dramatically increased the carrying capacity of the planet. People thinking "oh, life wasn't so bad in the late 19th/early 20th century" aren't thinking through the technology available then would reduce the carrying capacity of the planet by 60%. 60% of humanity perishing in a relatively short period of time has never happened before and should be thought of as a civilization threatening event. The collapse of modern civilization will set us back for centuries.