3 ms·
Ooooh DAMN. Interesting idea. That part that pisses me off is that I was very familiar with all the concepts that you used, but I doubt I ever came close to the
by O_H_E 4y ago
Ooooh DAMN.
Interesting idea.
That part that pisses me off is that I was very familiar with all the concepts that you used, but I doubt I ever came close to the conclusion.
Ok, I concur, I was probably not aware that color mixing is a human physiology thing and not a physics thing.
So to clarify, when we mix red and green playdough as kids, what happens is all the little particulates/molecules interweave together, but each is reflecting a different signal. And when that variation/entropy back-and-forth between red and green is too high, the brain just melds them to yellow?
- zamfi 4y ago> And when that variation/entropy back-and-forth between red and green is too high, the brain just melds them to yellow? Not “melds them”: it is yellow. A specific yellow, to a human, is any of the SPDs that triggers the same amount of “red” and “green” cone activity. It’s not some kind of brain interpretation trick, it’s literally the same signals reported by your eyes.
- numpad0 4y agoIf my interpretation is correct: human_eyes.input(emit_light(580)) -> ((0.5, 0.5, 0), "Pure Yellow") human_eyes.input(emit_light([[650, 0.3456], [550, 0.4567], [450, 0.0]])) -> ((0.5, 0.5, 0), "Pure Yellow") human_eyes.input(emit_light([[670, 0.00625], [640, 0.03125], ... [450, 0.0]])) -> ((0.5, 0.5, 0), "Pure Yellow") ... because input is a list but output is a weighted average in a single 3D vector.