3 ms·
Acoustic neuromas (almost 100% curable) and glioblastoma (aggressive, very poor outcomes) are quite different diseases. It is unlikely there is a unifying expos
by Gatsky 5y ago
Acoustic neuromas (almost 100% curable) and glioblastoma (aggressive, very poor outcomes) are quite different diseases. It is unlikely there is a unifying exposure.
One technique to unravel this is to perform whole genome sequencing on the tumours. Mutagenic carcinogens (which isn’t all carcinogens, but generally includes ionizing radiation) will leave signatures in the tumour DNA. The same unexpected signature in the acoustic neuromas and malignant gliomas would be a smoking gun.
Incidentally, I don’t know why nobody has used this fact to sue Big Tobacco into oblivion. You can literally prove cigarettes caused your lung/head and neck cancer.
- sigmoid10 5y ago> I don’t know why nobody has used this fact to sue Big Tobacco into oblivion. People did. All the way to the Supreme Court. Big Tobacco lost millions because of that. See e.g. here: https://www.reuters.com/article/idINBRE82P0NR20120326 https://www.reuters.com/article/idINBRE82P0NR20120326