2 ms·
That's entirely untrue. There was a large outcry after the announcement of CentOS Stream and many people moved to Rocky and Alma. Everybody knows rolling relea
by RedShift1 5y ago
That's entirely untrue. There was a large outcry after the announcement of CentOS Stream and many people moved to Rocky and Alma. Everybody knows rolling release is not "enterprise" and "production ready".
- nix23 5y ago>Everybody knows rolling release is not "enterprise" and "production ready" It really depends, if you want to install things like a big oracle db, then a classical LTS distro is better. But if your instances have short/medium lifecycles and good tests in place, then a rolling distro can even be a time saver (because you migrate your scripts/confs all the time a bit, and nothing massive like from a 10yo release to the new one)