3 ms·

All the won lawsuits kind of support the link between cancer and Roundup. Also stuff like this makes believe that there are many cases out there: "the lawyer f

by tokai 5y ago

All the won lawsuits kind of support the link between cancer and Roundup. Also stuff like this makes believe that there are many cases out there: "the lawyer for the RoundUp Virginia plaintiffs had been charged with extortion after offering to stop searching for more plaintiffs if he was paid a $200 million consulting fee by a manufacturer of glyphosate." https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Roundup_(herbicide)#Legal https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Roundup_(herbicide)#Legal

User23 5y ago
No, the won lawsuits support the link between good lawyers and winning cases. Lawsuits have no evidentiary value with respect to scientific proof.
- deleted 5y ago
  [deleted]
- voakbasda 5y ago
  Agreed. The courts are not respecting the science. They are pandering to public outrage.
  - TomSwirly 5y ago
    Your science credentials are...?
    - Veen 5y ago
      Bad faith question. You don't need science credentials to understand that court rulings aren't scientific evidence. It's either a true statement or it isn't (and it is).