>That's a revolting little bit of writing. NL surrendered after being overrun by the Germans, which took 5 days, not three hours Would you have found what belt

>That's a revolting little bit of writing. NL surrendered after being overrun by the Germans, which took 5 days, not three hours Would you have found what belter wrote less "revolting" had he written that Dutch surrender occurred after five days? I think not. >> The fact the US President goes on a big motorcade is what allows the Dutch prime minister to promenade himself on a bike ;-) >And that just isn't correct. How is what belter wrote wrong? Certain cities/entities/nations in the US and elsewhere in the West declare themselves to be "nuclear-free zones". They have the luxury of performing such virtue signaling because other places aren't nuclear-free. >Really, your comment is in pretty bad taste. Why not just call belter's comment "problematic"? I think that's the go-to pejorative description nowadays.