5 ms·
For medical issues, I agree that private is usually best; or at least restricted to close friends and family. Imminent death often has an adjacent position, whe
by murphyslab 4y ago
For medical issues, I agree that private is usually best; or at least restricted to close friends and family. Imminent death often has an adjacent position, where people commonly wish to share with a broader audience.
However it was just an example of an emergency where one might strongly desire to update a broad range of friends and family quickly. Other situations might be natural disasters or a house fire where one "We're alive!" post might require a follow-up the next day with more details, needs, or grief.
It's just to say that an unyielding, global rate limit would not serve peoples' interests well.
- FFRefresh 4y agoI sometimes wonder whether our goal of making everything as convenient & frictionless as possible is part of our problem. By serving some of our short-term interests, are we jeopardizing our long-term interests? I'm personally okay with seeing products that have well-intended friction built into them.