4 ms·
>it's really tough choosing component values that don't ring like a bell, a loud bell, at pretty high frequencies That doesn't sound right to me. It's not real
by exmadscientist 5y ago
>it's really tough choosing component values that don't ring like a bell, a loud bell, at pretty high frequencies
That doesn't sound right to me. It's not really about the component values. It's about the parasitics and the edge rates that can ring those parasitics. The main LC elements are not usually the problem (especially at high frequencies).
> for simulations
You cannot simulate any SMPS for EMC reasons without including the layout. Full stop, do not pass Go, etc. You can simulate for functionality and you can avoid some well-known traps, but you'll never be able to be confident without the layout included. Never.
> run the input voltage as high as feasable
Usually you want your duty cycle around 50%. Higher input voltages will push that down, which is usually a bad thing and requires special measures to compensate. And switch capacitances are rarely a major problem below line voltages, so you don't get much return on it either.
What, exactly, are you trying to do?
(Disclaimer: professional EE but not a power guy. I do little SMPS stuff up to 24V all the time though, especially low-noise analog supplies.)
- mgsouth 5y agoI'm just getting into analog electronics. Nominally, I'm trying to synthesize 90VAC @ 30mA (telephone ring signal) using buck/boost from a "reasonable" input voltage with reasonable efficiency. Not anywhere close to worrying about interference, but seeing simulated 3A swings at 1MHz is not encouraging... A big chunk of that is due to gate/src & src/drain capacitance. I'm finding that jacking up the inductance leads to really high average currents, cutting the inductance means really small damping resistors and high current again, shrinking the output capacitance helps the ringing and quickly gets the voltage where I need it, but now the ripple is horrible... fun times!