4 ms·
“What if they have no code they can legally show” > Sorry to be blunt, but chances are they aren't very good, and they are definitely not as good as they think
by vmception 4y ago
“What if they have no code they can legally show”
> Sorry to be blunt, but chances are they aren't very good, and they are definitely not as good as they think they are.
and there it is, one of the other subthreads is making fun of this kind of employer that swear by showing code
this is a false attribution bias where you decided not to notice that every evaluation technique the entire industry figured out will mostly by filled with people that cant code
your technique is simple no better
- leaflets2 4y ago> every evaluation technique the entire industry figured out will mostly by filled with people that cant code Is there a typo? The sentence doesn't make sense to me
- vmception 4y agoEvery evaluation technique will be mostly filled by people that cant code The industry tries them all Its the wrong conclusion on the efficacy of the technique
- leaflets2 4y agoHmm, and evaluation technique cannot be filled by something One cannot fill an abstract concept like a technique with things Maybe you mean that every evaluation technique will detect that most of the job applicants aren't good at coding? And therefore, all evaluation techniques seem to work? (Although some techniques are a lot better than others) If so, then, yes I agree. That's a good point