3 ms·
> Theoretically, then the bike should be stopping. As I and others have pointed out elsewhere, the law hasn't changed at all what a bike may or should do when
by cnelsenmilt 5y ago
> Theoretically, then the bike should be stopping.
As I and others have pointed out elsewhere, the law hasn't changed at all what a bike may or should do when there is a car present. It only covers the situation when there is no other traffic.
- giantg2 5y agoAnd that doesn't conflict with what I'm saying - that you have to have the visibility/design at that intersection to be able to see that there are no cars present; that if a bike can safely see that there are no other cars around and keep rolling, then a car could too.