It’s telling how your libertarian astroturfing site accepts conservation groups’ numbers re: increasing/stable polar bear populations, but not the same groups’

It’s telling how your libertarian astroturfing site accepts conservation groups’ numbers re: increasing/stable polar bear populations, but not the same groups’ estimates those populations will drop by 30% within two decades due to ice loss. It’s the kind of thing you’d expect them to try to disprove… if they weren’t just a libertarian astroturfing site. The bad faith is also comically obvious when deaths from national disasters is your chosen metric, as if more better mitigation and response efforts disprove either the increasing occurrence of severe weather events or that they’re caused by changing climate.