Yes, I think that’s an appropriate comment. Why is them that we consider kings? Because our social imaginary [1] now is that of technocracy. Whoever can create

Yes, I think that’s an appropriate comment. Why is them that we consider kings? Because our social imaginary [1] now is that of technocracy. Whoever can create technology and achieve money with technology is who’s worthy. And why do we need kings? I don’t think there is consensus in this response but psychoanalysis and philosophy [2] have said a lot about this. [1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Imaginary_(sociology) https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Imaginary_(sociology) [2] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Master%E2%80%93slave_dialectic https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Master%E2%80%93slave_dialectic