3 ms·

"working" ? ...as in just pushing some deaths a few months in the future while being extremely inconvenient for everything and everyone and damaging to the glob

"working" ? ...as in just pushing some deaths a few months in the future while being extremely inconvenient for everything and everyone and damaging to the global economy to an extent that might be more than the price of those lives

gpm 4y ago
> ..as in just pushing some deaths a few months in the future I don't get the impression that the people in charge, or the people not-in-charge in China, agree with this assessment. I.e. to quote from the thread > If you're telling Chinese "Omicron can't be beaten" it's a hard sell because the West has been telling us COVID can't be beaten for two years- and most provinces here already have beaten Omicron. ... > being extremely inconvenient for everything and everyone and damaging to the global economy As above, to again quote from the thread I linked > Most Chinese have experienced few significant restrictions in the last two years due to COVID-Zero, fast lockdowns, and mass testing done at under 100 cases. The first time we hear about something new being tried- straying from that, it's an unforgivable human rights catastrophy. > We've been basically living a normal life for two years while we watch the rest of the world meltdown in a furnace of exceptionalism, overconfidence, and science denial. It's going to very, very hard to convince Chinese that we're doing it wrong.
bllguo 4y ago
China's policies have kept the global economy afloat. They've been operating for the last two years almost at normal, in stark contrast to the US and company. And what a disgusting comment to make. Yes, how dare they stop producing goods for us to consume! Do you also discuss our obligations to the global economy like this? What is our comeuppance to be for our comically poor COVID policies reducing global demand?

3 ms·

"working" ? ...as in just pushing some deaths a few months in the future while being extremely inconvenient for everything and everyone and damaging to the glob

by catchclose8919 4y ago

gpm 4y ago
> ..as in just pushing some deaths a few months in the future I don't get the impression that the people in charge, or the people not-in-charge in China, agree with this assessment. I.e. to quote from the thread > If you're telling Chinese "Omicron can't be beaten" it's a hard sell because the West has been telling us COVID can't be beaten for two years- and most provinces here already have beaten Omicron. ... > being extremely inconvenient for everything and everyone and damaging to the global economy As above, to again quote from the thread I linked > Most Chinese have experienced few significant restrictions in the last two years due to COVID-Zero, fast lockdowns, and mass testing done at under 100 cases. The first time we hear about something new being tried- straying from that, it's an unforgivable human rights catastrophy. > We've been basically living a normal life for two years while we watch the rest of the world meltdown in a furnace of exceptionalism, overconfidence, and science denial. It's going to very, very hard to convince Chinese that we're doing it wrong.
bllguo 4y ago
China's policies have kept the global economy afloat. They've been operating for the last two years almost at normal, in stark contrast to the US and company. And what a disgusting comment to make. Yes, how dare they stop producing goods for us to consume! Do you also discuss our obligations to the global economy like this? What is our comeuppance to be for our comically poor COVID policies reducing global demand?