Surely there is both a status quo and survival bias going on with the existing leadership/management team. When you have an outside person who wants to change s

Surely there is both a status quo and survival bias going on with the existing leadership/management team. When you have an outside person who wants to change some fundamental things about the company, it seems natural that there would be resistance. As an outsider, I'm personally intrigued by the prospect. There are two things he's mentioned that I think could be very beneficial (outside of freedom of expression) to society: 1. Transparency - open sourced algorithms for what shows when and transparency about moderation decisions 2. Reduced short-term financial incentives - Given it'd be bank-rolled by someone with a lot of money and private, they wouldn't need to play the gray area game of increasing advertising & data sharing that other sites do.