> The position of non-voting shares is quite precarious I think, because a voting majority in the company can simply dilute shares and render the STAK-owned sha

> The position of non-voting shares is quite precarious I think, because a voting majority in the company can simply dilute shares and render the STAK-owned shares less valuable. I figure this is probably the case with most employee stock grants -- it's unlikely they'll give out enough shares that even every employee working together could sway elections.