3 ms·
> The article shows a piece of code that makes that promise and then doesn't hold up its part of the agreement. Edit: disregard; I now see your other comments.
by cstrahan 5y ago
> The article shows a piece of code that makes that promise and then doesn't hold up its part of the agreement.
Edit: disregard; I now see your other comments.
Incorrect. The article shows a piece of code that makes and fulfills that promise, and then the optimization passes break the code. If you disagree, I would be interested in hearing how/where you think the code itself is faulty.
- xscott 5y agoNo, I was sloppy when I read it the first time. The second snippet of code is broken, and I (incorrectly) assumed it was a valid translation from the first snippet. My bad. The first snippet is subtle, and I'm not a language lawyer, but I can't see anything that screams "contract violation".