4 ms·
Spam, for want of content, is no virtue.
by nh23423fefe 5y ago
Spam, for want of content, is no virtue.
- awillen 5y agoThis begs the age-old question - whose content is less valuable: the person who posts the substanceless comment or the person who replies to it with an equally substanceless comment pointing out that it's a substanceless comment? Ethicists may never come to a consensus (at least not until they can agree on who's worse between the person who ccs a huge number of people who should be bcced or the person who replies all saying that they should have bcced everyone and asking everyone not to reply all).
- lcnPylGDnU4H9OF 5y agoMaybe they're both undesirable.