4 ms·
For 1. Their evidence does not support the argument, since they impose a boundary condition on how low you can estimate and how low you can perform. To show th
by 8note 5y ago
For 1. Their evidence does not support the argument, since they impose a boundary condition on how low you can estimate and how low you can perform.
To show that high performers don't overestimate their skills you have to give them the opportunity to
- andersource 5y agoSorry, but this doesn't make sense to me. There has to be a boundary - a person who got all the answers wrong can't underestimate their performance, and a person who got all the answers right can't overestimate their performance. You could make the case that boundary effects are all DK is about, but that's not what the article is doing (and also I don't think such a claim is supported by the DK plot).