3 ms·
My takeaway, which may be flawed, is that the DK effect really hasn’t been debunked it any fundamental way. It’s just that the effect is statistical rather than
by bandyaboot 5y ago
My takeaway, which may be flawed, is that the DK effect really hasn’t been debunked it any fundamental way. It’s just that the effect is statistical rather than psychological. High skilled individuals are still more likely to underestimate their skill level while low skilled individuals are still more likely to overestimate theirs. It’s just that everyone is bad at estimating their skill level and high skilled individuals have more room to estimate below their actual, while low skilled individuals have more room to miss above.
Is my reasoning flawed in some way?