3 ms·
>Fr Pullicino, [...] based his conclusions on earlier finding of forensic and medical experts who investigated the Shroud of Turin. Well, the Shroud of Turin i
by whatshisface 5y ago
>Fr Pullicino, [...] based his conclusions on earlier finding of forensic and medical experts who investigated the Shroud of Turin.
Well, the Shroud of Turin is fake, so the conclusion is probably wrong.
- ramesh31 5y ago>Well, it's a fake, so the conclusion is probably wrong. Shhh... we all know radiocarbon dating is pseudoscience.
- polishdude20 5y agoFurther down they do mention this: More recent studies – conducted in 2012 and 2015 – argue instead that the science proves that the linen sheet dates precisely from the time of Jesus. That's all I'm sayin'
- bb88 5y agoSo most art forgeries use canvases from the period of the original. Also: "The French theologian Juan Calvino pointed out in the 16th century, in the midst of a boom in the traffic of relics where the pieces of the so-called “vera cruz” distributed by churches and monasteries abounded, that “if we wanted to collect everything that has been found (from the cross), there would be enough to carry a great ship. ” https://digismak.com/what-happened-to-the-cross-on-which-jesus-died-and-was-it-really-found/ https://digismak.com/what-happened-to-the-cross-on-which-jes...