3 ms·
There seem to be some missing facts. The statement from the business indicates that their defense for firing him was that they reasonably believed his flip-out
by tiahura 5y ago
There seem to be some missing facts. The statement from the business indicates that their defense for firing him was that they reasonably believed his flip-out could be the start of going postal.
Without knowing what he said, it’s hard to judge. Since the jury found for plaintiff, I’m going to guess they didn’t see it as a credible threat.
- Jiro 5y agoIf you were an employer who fired someone in this situation for no reason other than having a panic attack without hurting anyone, you'd probably lie and say that the panic attack put you in fear that he'd hurt someone.