It seems like the author is calling a Twitter account a "site" and at least once seems to call the Twitter account a "company". "However, the site [@LibsOfTikT

It seems like the author is calling a Twitter account a "site" and at least once seems to call the Twitter account a "company". "However, the site [@LibsOfTikTok] highlights liberals speaking about themselves and their values in their own voices. There is no explanation, which is common for the company." Is the "company" in that quote the LibsOfTikTok account? Is that a corporate account? Do they have a website? I also think it's poor form to not begin with the strongest explanation of what happened. The author should start out by giving Twitter's case, to the best of his ability if Twitter has not made their case public, and then explain what problems he has with Twitter's point of view. That seems to be entirely lacking from this piece.