3 ms·
This feels almost incoherent enough to be AI generated. I'm not sure what the argument being made even is. Are they mad that Elon wants to buy twitter because
by dotnet00 5y ago
This feels almost incoherent enough to be AI generated. I'm not sure what the argument being made even is.
Are they mad that Elon wants to buy twitter because he's rich? Are they mad because of his stated position on free speech? Are they trying to point to some imagined hypocrisy in people considering twitter a public square who are also cheering Elon's attempted purchase of it?
In the end the company would just be moving from one set of millionaires and billionaires to another set.
And then what's with the sudden tangent to AI regulation?
- zeroonetwothree 5y ago> Are they mad that Elon wants to buy twitter because he's rich? Are they mad because of his stated position on free speech? I think yes to both. But they don't want to just blatantly say it so it's wrapped in some kind of gibberish.
- mft_ 5y agoQuite - a lot of words spent to make no particular point that I could discern.
- golemotron 5y agoYes. The headline talks about sulky billionaires but the whole article is sulky.
- the_common_man 5y agoBoth can be true
- deleted 5y ago[deleted]