3 ms·
I'm understanding this all as a way to simplify designs and make it easier to bring in central controllers and automation to manage end to end 'virtual circuits
by dvno42 4y ago
I'm understanding this all as a way to simplify designs and make it easier to bring in central controllers and automation to manage end to end 'virtual circuits'.
I've never heard of segment routing (SRv6) and I'm happy to see it's not a proprietary feature by some vendor[1]. If I'm understanding correctly, segment routing allows a designer to cut out the traditional labeling and traffic engineering protocols like RSVP-TE and LDP/TDP but still retain the ability to do multipathing (ECMP) and traffic engineering.
What I'm not sure of is if this replaces VPLS/EVPN (overlay VPN mechanism) or if those features still ride on top of SRv6. It looks like the IGP (routing protocol like OSPF) needs extension support for SRv6 to work.
I just found a Cisco presentation that touches on a lot of this[2].
For those wondering, these features are available today on the major platforms
[1]https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/rfc8986 https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/rfc8986
[2]https://www.ciscolive.com/c/dam/r/ciscolive/apjc/docs/2018/pdf/BRKRST-1124.pdf https://www.ciscolive.com/c/dam/r/ciscolive/apjc/docs/2018/p...