3 ms·
I think the issue starts with the moniker "shamanic", which does not sound like a place many people would trust their health to.
by suction 4y ago
I think the issue starts with the moniker "shamanic", which does not sound like a place many people would trust their health to.
- hutzlibu 4y agoWell, I would rather say there are probably way too many people, who would totally trust such a place with their whole health, just because of the name and some other esoteric buzzwords like indigenous, ancient wisdom. I do have great respect for "real" shamans. But I met way too many fake ones, handing out horrible and dangerous advice, while glowing in their self declared illuminative state of higher consciousness.
- aaaaaaaaata 4y agoWhere'd you find these?
- hutzlibu 4y agoAll around the world. Most are quite harmless and you still can have interesting conversations with them. Some are more weird and even dangerous, like this individual, which I have not met personally, but people like him. https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jake_Angeli https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jake_Angeli
- mountainriver 4y agoYeah its interesting because I've had absolutely game changing experiences with real shamans, and then bad experiences with phony ones. If you find a good one, stick with them