3 ms·

Cock comment leads to crackdown on climate activists

IngoBlechschmid 4y ago
The same police unit (for "state protection") previously raided Tor activists in Augsburg: https://torservers.net/blog/2018-07-04-zwiebelfreunde-raid/ https://torservers.net/blog/2018-07-04-zwiebelfreunde-raid/
- Raccooon 4y ago
  Disgusting abuse of power on activists -- what were they even originally accused of??
antonly 4y ago
This is pretty bad, apparently they didn't even let him contact his lawyer: "The actions of the police are also being criticized because Mai was apparently not allowed to contact his lawyer during the house search". That's just straight up illegal.
- 7h3HeadTag 4y ago
  Did they give any reasons? Was he posing a threat? Or are they denying it now?
  - antonly 4y ago
    They said that the person being searched is not allowed to make phone calls, which is correct except when they want to contact their lawyer. They just omitted that part apparently...
YisforYee 4y ago
Are there english news on this?
- Raccooon 4y ago
  The linked article is in English, the other ones linked on their website are all in German: https://www.pimmelgate-süd.de/ https://www.xn--pimmelgate-sd-7ob.de/
7h3HeadTag 4y ago
What I don't understand is how seizing all his gadgets is of any use... if he is straight up saying that he wrote the comment himself. A joke of a judge must have allowed this.
- wolfskaempf 4y ago
  This is not the first time the Staatsanwaltschaft (public prosecutors office) of Augsburg has made dubious and potentially politically motivated decisions. If you look at the list of dubious cases and their sources on Wikipedia (perhaps using a translator service) there seems to be a worrying trend and continuity to their questionable decisions. [0] Notably their 2013 decision to allow a police raid on the regional newspaper Augsburger Allgemeine because an unknown individual posted an allegedly offensive comment against the CDU politician Volker Ulrich in the comments section on the newspapers website raises questions about whether the same decision would have been made had the „victim“ not been an important member of the party in power in the city of Augsburg. Or their 2009 decision to allow a police raid on someone who was accused of illegally downloading two individual songs worth 1,29 each. [0] https://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Staatsanwaltschaft_Augsburg https://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Staatsanwaltschaft_Augsburg

The same police unit (for "state protection") previously raided Tor activists in Augsburg: https://torservers.net/blog/2018-07-04-zwiebelfreunde-raid/ https://torservers.net/blog/2018-07-04-zwiebelfreunde-raid/

Raccooon 4y ago
Disgusting abuse of power on activists -- what were they even originally accused of??

antonly 4y ago

This is pretty bad, apparently they didn't even let him contact his lawyer: "The actions of the police are also being criticized because Mai was apparently not allowed to contact his lawyer during the house search". That's just straight up illegal.

7h3HeadTag 4y ago
Did they give any reasons? Was he posing a threat? Or are they denying it now?
- antonly 4y ago
  They said that the person being searched is not allowed to make phone calls, which is correct except when they want to contact their lawyer. They just omitted that part apparently...

YisforYee 4y ago

Are there english news on this?

Raccooon 4y ago
The linked article is in English, the other ones linked on their website are all in German: https://www.pimmelgate-süd.de/ https://www.xn--pimmelgate-sd-7ob.de/

7h3HeadTag 4y ago

What I don't understand is how seizing all his gadgets is of any use... if he is straight up saying that he wrote the comment himself. A joke of a judge must have allowed this.

wolfskaempf 4y ago
This is not the first time the Staatsanwaltschaft (public prosecutors office) of Augsburg has made dubious and potentially politically motivated decisions. If you look at the list of dubious cases and their sources on Wikipedia (perhaps using a translator service) there seems to be a worrying trend and continuity to their questionable decisions. [0] Notably their 2013 decision to allow a police raid on the regional newspaper Augsburger Allgemeine because an unknown individual posted an allegedly offensive comment against the CDU politician Volker Ulrich in the comments section on the newspapers website raises questions about whether the same decision would have been made had the „victim“ not been an important member of the party in power in the city of Augsburg. Or their 2009 decision to allow a police raid on someone who was accused of illegally downloading two individual songs worth 1,29 each. [0] https://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Staatsanwaltschaft_Augsburg https://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Staatsanwaltschaft_Augsburg