4 ms·
The writer's argument pretty much boils down to the claim that java will be faster than ruby on rails even more than now. For technical reasons why he claims th
by jsnk 15y ago
The writer's argument pretty much boils down to the claim that java will be faster than ruby on rails even more than now. For technical reasons why he claims this, read the article. I don't know enough to know if his technical claim is true or not, but here is why I won't be switching from rails to java anytime soon.
I previously worked with c# and asp.net which may be comparable to java in many regards. I currently work with rails. In my experience, the ability to build rapid prototypes with rails simply trumps marginal gain you might get out of performance improvement with .net or java frameworks. I think the writer also agrees with this statement. Pretty much anything you build with java, you can build faster with ruby on rails. So I'll probably stick with rails for a while.
Things might certainly be different for larger firms that have exhaustive developer resources to close the gap of developing time between java and ruby.
- Roboprog 15y agoIt's been 2005 since I worked on ASPX.NET & C#, but this was a different kind of Evil than stuff like Struts. JSP/servlet setup isn't too bad, but even more clumsy slow stuff typically gets piled on top. Rails is cool, though. But it's not what feeds the kids out here in Sacramento. At least not yet.