3 ms·
>an alternative argument is that the West is fighting for liberal democracy Trying to reverse the results of a referendum where 80% voted and 90% voted yes and
by pydry 5y ago
>an alternative argument is that the West is fighting for liberal democracy
Trying to reverse the results of a referendum where 80% voted and 90% voted yes and multiple western polls confirm the result doesnt exactly show a resounding commitment to democracy.
Nor does being besties with Saudi Arabia.
From an imperialistic perspective both make perfect sense though. Saudi is a global energy chokepoint and Crimea is a regional strategic chokepoint for a rival empire.
- matthewdgreen 5y agoI choose not to give much weight to a referendum held under military occupation. More generally, "the West is a lot of different people." Many of them are lousy and have made lousy decisions, such as the support for Saudi Arabia. Democracy doesn't mean perfection, and I'm hugely in favor of making it better. I don't think supporting the current basket of authoritarian regimes on offer is "better". We can agree to disagree.
- pydry 5y agoHow do you square your belief in democracy with your belief that 90% of Crimeans who want the referendum result respected should be totally ignored? (90% was also the result of a German run poll 2 years later without tanks present... the poll was consistent with the referendum) It's worth bearing in mind that Kyiv has no intention of rerunning the poll if Russia leaves likely coz they know what the result would be. It will simply reincorporate the territory. The only vote that was ever going to happen after Maidan was with Russian tanks present. I dont think this is about agreeing to disagree or about accepting imperfections in democracy. This is about an overarching willingness of our society to discard democracy when it conflicts with western imperialist objectives. Not only are we willing to do it we are willing to engage in orwellian doublethink about it.