4 ms·
I love Neovim. It's been my main editor for years now. The way it handles terminal sessions is so much better than vanilla Vim. Also LSP rocks.
by bheadmaster 5y ago
I love Neovim. It's been my main editor for years now. The way it handles terminal sessions is so much better than vanilla Vim. Also LSP rocks.
- enriquto 5y agoWhat do you mean by "terminal sessions"? I use vim inside regular xterms or tmux. Am I using such terminal sessions already? What would be different in nvim?
- paskozdilar 5y agoI mean the buffer with a shell that opens when you type: :term I remember vanilla vim doing some weird stuff, like leaving the buffer open even though I've exited the shell, requiring me to close it manually. I don't know if it's been fixed since.
- sophacles 5y agoBoth vim and neovim have the ability to open a terminal in a window split. It's not my preferred workflow but some people really like it rather than tmux or ctel-z to drop onto a shell... the implementation of this feature in neovim is a lot nicer than the one in vim. One thing i do use it for: In neovim there's options to open the terminal as a sort of overlay on top of the existing splits, they call it floating term. Its really nice for opening tools ( e.g. lazygit or a test runner) because find it a bit less disruptive than having to bounce in and out of the editor by other means.
- yw3410 5y agoWhy wouldn't you set the makeprg and have it populate the quickfix list instead?
- sophacles 5y agoBecause lazygit doesn't really work that way? Because running tests doesn't necessarily play nice with quickfix? I do set the make program to build and get errors via the quickfix when there isn't a good lsp server for the language. When there is an lsp server for the language, why bother with a special make command? - the same info is just populated inline for you.
- yw3410 5y agoWhat do you mean by "play nice"? I tend to use quickfix lists because I can edit/filter/persist them; so for example I'll have some tests/warnings but won't care about them for the moment but then rerun the command and get the diff and navigate to that. It's fairly complicated to script the same using the LSP api.
- canaus 5y agoIt might not be what they want to do.
- Winsaucerer 5y agoIt's really useful to be able to use visual mode on your terminal window, to copy things. That's something you don't get via ctrl-z or tmux.
- ksala_ 5y agoTmux has support visual mode (at least character and line), I use it all the times. I don't remember if it's enabled by default, but I have this in my ~/.tmuxrc (where pbcopy is the excellent https://github.com/skaji/remote-pbcopy-iterm2/blob/master/pbcopy https://github.com/skaji/remote-pbcopy-iterm2/blob/master/pb...) # Enable vi mode setw -g mode-keys vi # Copy to host bind-key -T copy-mode-vi v send-keys -X begin-selection bind-key -T copy-mode-vi y send-keys -X copy-pipe "pbcopy" unbind -T copy-mode-vi Enter bind-key -T copy-mode-vi Enter send-keys -X copy-pipe "pbcopy" It mostly work as expected, ctrl+B ] enter copy mode, then you can use / and ? to search, v to enter character visual mode, V to enter line visual mode and y/enter to copy the selection.
- patricius 5y agoBetter than :term in Vim 8? How so?
- paskozdilar 5y agoCopying from the other comment: I remember vanilla vim doing some weird stuff, like leaving the buffer open even though I've exited the shell, requiring me to close it manually. I don't know if it's been fixed since.
- capableweb 5y agoSame here! It was the first project I helped funding, and been funding it for as long as they have allowed donations. The biggest feature for me is being able to use lua instead of vimscript for basically everything now. I never learned vimscript properly, and now I don't have to anymore either! Win-win.