3 ms·
Interestingly I find some of your points to have the same issue you raised of the article Categorizing the other side, their supporters and their size as veste
by zaphirplane 5y ago
Interestingly I find some of your points to have the same issue you raised of the article
Categorizing the other side, their supporters and their size as vested, threatened, agenda, opinion don’t count and proximity related
Surely those apply to both sides
- jacquesm 5y agoI can't make heads or tails of your comment.
- zaphirplane 5y agoYou are discarding the views of countries because you think they have vested interest Another set of countries because of proximity another set because of reliance o Russia another set because they have similar design/intent Leaving the one true view as what matters The one true view that matters also lean on countries, have proximity to other countries and have designs and interests so why should their views be right and pure ?
- jacquesm 5y agoI suspect we have a language issue, I quite literally do not understand what it is that you are trying to convey. The one part that I understand is that you think that I have the 'one true view' which is clearly not the case, all I have is my opinion. I'm not 'discarding' any country because they are still there, all I'm trying to do is to figure out their reasoning for positioning themselves as they do in contrast to what the article claims, which I think is simply not supported by the facts. The rest of your comment I can either not parse, make sense of or reply to, sorry. If English is not your first language then it must be frustrating not to be able to communicate your ideas clearly, it isn't my first language either but I would definitely encourage you to keep trying because that is the only way to improve. Thanks!