4 ms·
Sounds clever but it’s pointless because you have to guarantee that you have enough bandwidth for the worst case, in your scheme when every pixel is changing ev
by tinus_hn 5y ago
Sounds clever but it’s pointless because you have to guarantee that you have enough bandwidth for the worst case, in your scheme when every pixel is changing every frame, anyway.
- andrewf 5y agoAgreed; it's the "constant work" principle https://aws.amazon.com/builders-library/reliability-and-constant-work/ https://aws.amazon.com/builders-library/reliability-and-cons...
- rbanffy 5y agoSure, but if you are not on the worst case (as in a desktop or anything where you don’t need every pixel changing on every frame) you can get higher spatial and temporal resolutions than you’d get from the dumb pipe as designed.