3 ms·
They did admit they fucked up. Then they tried to make the best of it by looking for possible ways of preventing other people from repeating their mistake. Wha
by aerovistae 5y ago
They did admit they fucked up. Then they tried to make the best of it by looking for possible ways of preventing other people from repeating their mistake.
What did you want? A blog post that says "I suck, I'm a failure, thanks for reading"? Why is this your response to someone trying to be contructive while post-morteming a failure?
- throwaway0x7E6 5y agothe guy with 10+ experience of using github went to the "danger zone", pressed the red button, saw the very, very, very explicit warning about the consequences of pressing it and confirmed the action by explicitly typing the exact name of the repository. yes, that blog post would've been apt. as constructive as it gets. >Why is this your response because I don't want to send a notarized request every time I need to delete a folder, format a disk or submit a SQL query
- user_7832 5y ago> because I don't want to send a notarized request every time I need to delete a folder, format a disk or submit a SQL query Aah yes, the only 2 extreme options, no/minimal warnings and extreme warnings. "Who needs rationality or subtlety on the internet anyway?"
- BeFlatXIII 5y agoThis response would get you laughed out of the medical software industry (but welcomed with open arms by CMIOs and hospital administration). Physicians are known to click through all kinds of red-flag warnings because the legal team insisted they all be turned on to maximize patient safety.