4 ms·

AWS S3 bucket set to serve static pages, use the aws command line to sync it with your source folder. Its easy, cheap and resilient. If you want you can then

AWS S3 bucket set to serve static pages, use the aws command line to sync it with your source folder. Its easy, cheap and resilient. If you want you can then cloudflare the site or aws have an equivalent service.

aliswe 5y ago
Azure has the same, for the record
xupybd 5y ago
This is what I do. Two sites minimal traffic and it's something like 6 cents a month.
- rurban 5y ago
  GitHub Pages are 0 cents a month. With the best uptime and reachability stats of all static hosters
  - raffraffraff 5y ago
    Really? Better than Cloudflare, for example? I thought that github.com have had a rotten track record recently, but I'll be honest, I have no idea which services are/aren't impacted.
    - rurban 5y ago
      I couldn't find recent proper performance tests, only spam. This is an old one: https://savjee.be/2017/10/Static-website-hosting-who-is-fastest/ https://savjee.be/2017/10/Static-website-hosting-who-is-fast...
srvmshr 5y ago
I do mine with Google Cloud storage. I found it simpler for setting up than AWS. Have used both
- deleted 5y ago
  [deleted]